|

Forest Hill tells Mayor
"keep the pools"
The much heralded consultation on the future of Forest
Hill Pools stumbled to a beginning at the first of two consultations at
Sydenham Girls School on Wednesday night (October 5th 2005). Stumbled because
most of the consultation documents have yet to be circulated and there was no
obvious publicity to be found either at the Pools or nearby Library.
Nevertheless the word had got around and about 150 people came to hear what
Lewisham's Mayor (and Forest Hill resident) Steve Bullock had to say and
express their own opinions.
The consultation documents were there to be read. You
can find a copy (a large pdf document) <here>
Steve & the council's consultant from Capita
outlined the two options being presented as a choice for the Pools' users.
These are:
- Option 1: Retain and refurbish the existing
building
This option will provide the same facilities as currently
exist, but to a slightly higher specification. The centre would have two
swimming pools of the same length and width, a fitness studio, a wet changing
area, a meeting room, and an activity room. The first floor gallery in the main
pool would be removed. Approximate cost: £4
million.
- Option 2: Build a brand-new swimming facility on the
existing site
This option will provide a new singlestorey facility
built on the current site. The new facility will comprise one 25m six-lane
swimming pool with changing facilities that are accessible to disabled people
and which meet modern standards. This option would allow a more accessible car
park layout. It would include a fitness studio, however, there would be no
rooms for meetings or other activities. Approximate cost:
£4.7million.
The costs are similar so the decision dependes on the
weighting of advantages and disadvantages for each option. These can be
summarised as:
- Option 1: Retain and refurbish the existing
building
Advantages Retains the flexibility of two pools and the
historic facade Disadvantages High running costs, limited life and
difficulty of accessing changing rooms, possibility of early catastrophic
failure leading to closure
- Option 2: Build a brand-new swimming facility on the
existing site
Advantages Modern pool built to latest standards,
lower running costs and longer life, opportunity to landscape Dartmouth Road
approach Disadvantages Shared pool or more restrictive times for
different users, no amenity rooms
The audience was receptive, good tempered and about 30
people took the opportunity of asking questions or making points. Most of those
expressing a preference were in favour of the refurbishment option. Here are
some quotes:
Option 2 is only half as good... The Pools have
lasted 120 years, 1960s pools are failing now, why the projected short
life? £4m for refurbishment seems a high figure, it was only
£1.5m in May, why? Two pools means the family can enjoy different uses
at the same time... Can English Heritage give a grant to the oldest working
pool in London?
I've stopped going because of the disrepair - but I
love the facade In 1996 we came up with better changing room access, why are
they not in option 1? The Pools, the Library and Louise House are a cohesive
set of attractive buildings... Can we have an option 3? Will option 2 hit
the same delays as affected Downham Pools?
Please don't knock down a beautiful building
... What are the revenue projections for options 1 & 2? Hobson's
choice of short life or less facilities... Can we have a referendum? Will
the Mayor commit to keeping Louise House?
The Mayor & consultant responded that the two
options were feasibility studies and not proposals. That offering more options
would cause confusion and proposals to enhance option 1 with rear entrances and
water recycling would take it outside of the £4-£5m window
available from the council for the project.
It became apparent that the council regard option 1 as
being a higher risk option. Not only is the projected life difficult to access,
but the dangers of unexpected problems arising during the project had meant
that the actual identified refurbishment cost of £2.7m needed to be
contingenced up to the £4m stated.
English Heritage had been approached about possible
grants but even more favourable schemes had been declined. The Pools
refurbishment or rebuild would be entirely council financed so as long as the
decision is taken before there is another call on the money - the commitment
and timescale would be safe.
The Mayor stressed it was a consultation and not a
referendum. Sadly he could not legally delegate the decision to the people. It
was his, taken on advice and listening to opinion.
Councillors Pike (LibDem), Whiting & Wise (Labour)
made contributions. Rather than possibly mis-reporting them - Forest Hill has
asked them to submit their view for publication which will be included here
when received.
Another consultation meeting will be held on October
27th at Sydenham Girls School. All residents of Forest Hill & Sydenham are
invited to complete and return their preferred option contained within the
consultation document or make other representations by 25th November.
Editorial comment
Forest Hill is here to provide independent and
impartial reports on our community and to give all parties equal opportunity to
contribute their viewpoints. However it would be unfair not to report the
personal impression the evening made on the reporter who is not a user of the
Pools.
It would be difficult reading the consultation document
not to come to the conclusion that the council would prefer to go for option 2.
The lack of financial information and detail on both options negates objective
decision making by the people of Forest Hill. Inevitably this leads to a
natural desire by the people to keep what is known - ie option 1. Thus the
consultation might be seen as inevitably leading to collision between the
council's desire to minimise financial risk and the people's feeling they are
being kept in the dark.
This is not a criticism of the council. Indeed many
people during the evening were grateful for the mayor's unequivocal commitment
to keep swimming pools in Forest Hill. Consulting the people was also very
welcome. It is, perhaps, that we have much to learn before consultation is as
informed and powerful as it should be....
A short history of Forest Hill Pools can be found <here>
 |